Hello Chris et al, After having asked a specific question, now an open one: following with ideas for the PDL Next Generation development, or in a more broad sense, sci Perl. Do someone knows Perl modules for bokeh?
I am asking this because I am now moving many of my R and pdl modules to sci python using pandas-seaborn-bokeh-crossfilter. I have not found equivalent combination of tools in sci perl but probably exist. The pandas part can be more or less covered with PDL and Perl and its modules for 'dataframes' manipulation, seaborn is a ggplot2 (R graphics) port to python but I don´t know any for perl, bokeh and crossfilter creates reactive js and have libraries in python and R but not Perl (as far as I know). And all this works in iPython notebook. By the way, how is the progress of Devel::IPerl going? I know some people here are using it or participating in its development. Finally in 2011 there was this entry blog http://blogs.perl.org/users/lhermida/2011/03/hi-everyone-as-a-bioinformatician.html Where are we now? I am asking all this here, because I think that PDL (or its developers/users) would be big players in this arena and, as we are starting a new year, it could be that some new year resolutions slots are still free looking for an herculean challenging task ;-). Pablo. On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 7:30 PM, Chris Marshall <[email protected]> wrote: > It looks like it might be possible to use RPerl as one type of JIT > compiling that is supported by PDL-NG. > > --Chris > > On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 8:08 AM, Chris Marshall <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Happy New Year to you as well. >> >> I haven't tried rperl myself but from what >> I can tell, PDL as a C/XS module appears to >> be implemented with everything you can't >> do with rperl to run fast. >> >> That said, it might be possible to build >> and use PDL with rperl to take advantage >> of both capabilities. Maybe we should add >> "works with rperl" as one of the ideas for >> the PDL Next Generation development. >> >> Cheers, >> Chris >> >> On 1/6/2016 04:37, Pablo marin-garcia wrote: >> >> Hello, and happy new year, >> >> I was wondering if someone has tested Pdl with rperl. ( rperl stands for >> a rapid restricted Perl NOT perl R bindings) >> >> Also I would like to hear some thoughs about the use of rperl or similar >> ideas for boosting "scientific perl" usage (together with Pdl of course ;-)) >> >> http://rperl.org/use_rperl.html >> >> -------- >> https://metacpan.org/pod/RPerl::Learning >> *Section 1.8: What Does RPerl Stand For?* >> >> RPerl stands for *"Restricted Perl"*, in that we restrict our use of >> Perl to those parts which can be made to run fast. RPerl also stands >> for*"Revolutionary >> Perl"*, in that we hope RPerl's speed will revolutionize the software >> development industry, or at least the Perl community. RPerl might even >> stand for*"Roadrunner Perl"*, in that it *runs really fast*. >> >> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > pdl-general mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pdl-general > >
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ pdl-general mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pdl-general
