Hi Ed, I've noticed very strange clutter of # line ... in PP generated .c files, also PDL_LINEEND.* in .pm files.
This happens in modules built against PDL::2.060. E.g. PDL::Drawing::Prima and PDL::Stats On 11/9/2021 12:35 AM, Ed . wrote:Hi > > 2.059 had problems on more recent versions of the MinGW runtime. I > have now worked around these, and released a new 2.060 which seems to > work again. > > > > Please report any problems in 2.060! > > > > Best regards, > > Ed > > > > *From: *Ed . <mailto:[email protected]> > *Sent: *08 November 2021 05:04 > *To: *[email protected]; perldl > <mailto:[email protected]> > *Subject: *PDL 2.059 released > > > > Dear PDL folks, > > > > PDL 2.059 has just been released. Notable changes since 2.058: > > * pthreading now uses the number of available CPU cores if no > PDL_AUTOPTHREAD_TARG is set > * use of tgmath.h plus some macros makes for shorter generated functions > > > > The first point will mean you need to ensure you set “NoPthread=>1” on > your functions if that is necessary, for instance if you are calling > into a non-thread-safe library, or doing I/O. > > > > Future plans, in no particular order: > > * finish the independent C interface for making PDL usable from e.g. > Python > * more pervasive use of e.g. BLAS/LAPACK routines if available > * use OpenCL to also utilise GPUs if available > > > > The IRC channel (#pdl on irc.perl.org) is a great virtual place to > come and ask questions, or just watch the GitHub messages flow by. > > > > As usual, please give the new PDL a try and report problems. > > > > Best regards, > > Ed > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > pdl-general mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pdl-general
_______________________________________________ pdl-general mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pdl-general
