On 2 Jan 2001, at 19:53, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> While the 105/f2.4 isn't huge, some of the other 6x7 lenses are
> *enormous*. My 55/f3.5 has a front filter diameter of 100mm.
>
> Also, 6x7 lenses are quite expensive compared to 35mm. Anyone know
> how they compare quality wise? i.e. anyone used say the FA100/f.28
> macro *and* the 100/f4 macro on the sam camera?
>
> Lenses which are dual purpose 645 and 35mm would be more sensible, of
> course, but still putting a big penalty on 35mm users.
Hi Dave,
Try here:
http://www.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/pentaxmfvs35mmlenstest.html
Cheers,
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
Fax +61-2-9554-9259
UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications.html
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, visit www.pdml.net
and follow the directions.
