At 07:19 5.2.2001 -0500, you wrote:
>Actually, if scans are large, using 256 meg might be preferable.
>Besides, at $100 or less for each 128 meg, it's not a really
>big expense.
>
>Also, NT/2000 handle memory better than 95/98/ME.  They might be
>better OS choices as memory thrashing would be eliminated or more
>greatly reduced.  They're built for larger applications.

Add as much memory as you can afford! At least 256MB is good.

The only drawback with the current Windows 2000 / Photoshop 6.0 is
that before Adobe releases a service pack, Photoshop memory use
must be set to 30% of total RAM... otherwise you'll get troubles... argh.

Antti-Pekka

---
* Antti-Pekka Virjonen * Fiskarsinkatu 7 D       * GSM: +358 400 789753 *
* Computec Oy Turku    * FIN-20750 Turku Finland * Fax: +358 2 413 7777 *

-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .

Reply via email to