On 9 Feb 2001, at 17:22, Flavio Minelli wrote:

> Thanks all for your help.
> 
> BTW I finally managed to dig up some past comments on the matter where
> there actually was some 168-ballhead-bashing and more useful advice.
> 
> I know I'd probably need a 3-way head but that would make things a bit
> too heavy...
> 
> I'll try and make up my mind for tomorrow so I'll be able to tell you on
> Monday what my choice was.

Flavio,

If you intend to travel/trek apart from the extra weight of the 3 way heads 
(even the new Mag) beware that the protruding knobs (not in the case of the 
Mag head) can be a pain, they catch on things, they make packing more of 
a pain but it will offer more control over the standard ball head. I have just 
purchased a 441 for trekking and after consideration I opted for the 308 ball 
head (I have a spare 029 available). The 055Pro (455) is a great tripod and 
will give you at least a decade of excellent reliability (assuming that the new 
4 position leg locks are as good as the old 055).

Cheers,

Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
Fax +61-2-9554-9259
UTC(GMT)  +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications.html
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .

Reply via email to