Alan wrote: >If they sell as expensive as Nikon or Canon, most people would not > buy. Well, it didn't sell when it costed half Nikon money (Z-1p vs. F90). It only makes people believe its cheap because its crap. I cannt imagine how Pentax can manage to sell the same camera as Nikon do cheaper without loosing money. Pål - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
- MZ-S better than Z-1p? Wieland Willker
- Re: MZ-S better than Z-1p? Pål Jensen
- Re: MZ-S better than Z-1p? Chris Brogden
- Re: MZ-S better than Z-1p? Wieland Willker
- Re: MZ-S better than Z-1p? Pål Jensen
- Re: MZ-S better than Z-1p? PAUL STENQUIST
- Re: MZ-S better than Z-1p? Otis Wright, Jr.
- Re: MZ-S better than Z-1p? John Francis
- Re: MZ-S better than Z-1p? Pål Jensen
- Re: MZ-S better than Z-1p? SudaMafud
- Re: MZ-S better than Z-1p? Alan Chan
- Re: MZ-S better than Z-1p? herbet brasileiro
- Re: MZ-S better than Z-1p? John Glover
- Re: MZ-S better than Z-1p? Alan Chan
- Re: MZ-S better than Z-1p? William Robb
- Re: MZ-S better than Z-1p? SudaMafud
- Re: MZ-S better than Z-1p? William Robb