> -----Original Message----- > From: Andre Langevin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 12:02 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Pentax 645 portraits: 150mm or 200mm? > > > I have heard that the 120mm macro has bad bokeh. Is is true?
The bokeh doesn't seem so bad, but it's too short. http://www.bigdayphoto.com/venable/115.jpg http://www.bigdayphoto.com/venable/113cropped.jpg > (I have the lens but not the means to use it for the moment.) > > Question #2: Is there a difference in bokeh (or contrast) > between the > 150mm and the 200mm? Both being suitable for portrait. I can't speak for the 200, but the 150 reminds me a bit of the FA 85/1.4. I don't own it, but I've shot 4 or 5 rolls with one, and it's awesome. It's next on my list. I have a shot of Cesar around here somewhere - if I can find it I'll post it. tv
