But I shot some portraits and they looked very good.So where is the problem?How to describe bokeh in other words? Alek
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> napisał: >> Yep, but at the same time, the lens is reknown to have a harsh >> bokeh. Which is not important to all of us and certainly not to >> N*k*n users. > >Yes, the K 105/2.8 is a sharp lens, but (unfortunately) so is its >bokeh: > >http://www.cetussoft.com/pentax/k105f28/ > >[Make sure you're sitting down before you click on the "Some plants >at f/2.8" link - <g>.] > >In general, I like the ol' SMC K lenses a lot. I liked this lens, >too, ~except~ for its bokeh. However, bokeh is important to me in a >100-ish lens, which I would often be using for portraits, so I sent >my K 105/2.8 on to another home... > >Fred > --------------r-e-k-l-a-m-a----------------- Masz dość płacenia prowizji bankowi ? mBank - załóż konto http://epieniadze.onet.pl/mbank
