I firmly believe that it is aging the stuff in oak barrels that caused those delusions (Pentax DSLR in this case) we don't have that problem with the plane ol' corn liqueur we drink over here.
Ciao, Graywolf http://pages.prodigy.net/graywolfphoto ----- Original Message ----- From: "Cotty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Pentax List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2002 4:32 AM Subject: Re: smc 55 f2.0 > >What are the advantages of 55mm any opinions on this lens > > It becomes an 88mm on a Pentax DSLR at 1.6X mag factor for estimated chip > size. The 50mm is only 80mm effective, and not as good for portraiture > IMO. However, I'd still go for the wider aperture of the 50 1.4 or 1.2.... > > You did ask <g> > > Cotty > > ____________________________________ > Free UK Macintosh Classified Ads at > http://www.macads.co.uk/ > ____________________________________ > Oh, swipe me! He paints with light! > http://www.macads.co.uk/snaps/ > ____________________________________ >
