Dear PDML memebers! > Sorry for polish text! > And for you Sylwek thanks for the answer. > I asked about LX since I wrote somewhere that production costs of it were very > high and probably made losses! > I wonder if now Pentax makes profit. Of course they are strong in MF but what > about slr? > No pro camera, no lenses which are bought by pros so that is why I ask about > it. Probably not many people buy 80-200/2.8 which is very expensive and has no motor > sth like USM, AF-S etc. They MUST introduce sth new to find new clients, since now salesmen usually advice them to buy Canon/Nikon because of not the good optics but because these brands has above technologies and IS, VR! And everyone can see that pros use Canon/Nikon gear (sport,journalists etc). I just wonder if Pentax is able to give some journalists in future pro cameras+lenses just for advertisement > Alek
Użytkownik Sylwester Pietrzyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> napisał: >Hi, >I have used babelfish to translate Japanese Pentax pages and found very >interesting translation of on-line lenses catalogue. Below links may break, >so you may have to put them together: >http://babelfish.altavista.com/babelfish/urltrurl?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.penta >x.co.jp%2Fjapan%2Fproduct%2Fcamera%2Flense%2F35_spec%2F35_siyou_sz.html%23sz >-faz24f35-90f45&lp=ja_en&tt=url >http://babelfish.altavista.com/babelfish/urltrurl?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.penta >x.co.jp%2Fjapan%2Fproduct%2Fcamera%2Flense%2F35_spec%2F35_siyou_tz.html%23tz >-faz100f47-300f58&lp=ja_en&tt=url >http://babelfish.altavista.com/babelfish/urltrurl?tt=url&url=http%3A%2F%2Fww >w.pentax.co.jp%2Fjapan%2Fproduct%2Fcamera%2Flense%2F35_spec%2F35_siyou_t.htm >l&lp=ja_en >http://babelfish.altavista.com/babelfish/urltrurl?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.penta >x.co.jp%2Fjapan%2Fproduct%2Fcamera%2Flense%2F35_spec%2F35_siyou_m.html&lp=ja >_en&tt=url >http://babelfish.altavista.com/babelfish/urltrurl?tt=url&url=http%3A%2F%2Fww >w.pentax.co.jp%2Fjapan%2Fproduct%2Fcamera%2Flense%2F35_spec%2F35_siyou_s.htm >l&lp=ja_en >http://babelfish.altavista.com/babelfish/urltrurl?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.penta >x.co.jp%2Fjapan%2Fproduct%2Fcamera%2Flense%2F35_spec%2F35_siyou_w.html&lp=ja >_en&tt=url > >Just look at lenses descriptions. It seems that ghostless coating is applied >to almost every new lens produced after 199x (?)!!! So here we have not only >Limiteds, but also new FA 35/2, FA* 200/4 Macro and even cheap long zooms >like FA 100-300/4.7-5.8 and 80-320/4.5-5.6. Those lenses with ghostless >coating seems to be newer than the other and so it is no random mentioning >of "normal" SMC... What do you think? It seems that it is true, so Bojidar's >page should be updated than, and of course we could look at newer lenses >(even cheap ones) as better (in terms of multicoating) then older ones. That >made me think how many other mysteries could be solved if they only had >english version of their original site... > >-- >Best Regards >Sylwek >
