Paul Eriksson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > When I tried it on it was to short for me, not comfortable at all. By the > way, I'm 5 11. Otherwise it's a good bag for a god price. >
Hi Feroze, I too find it a bit too short (I'm 180cm), nevertheless it's my main backpack. Never experienced any problem, I think it is very sturdy. I usually load it with the following gear: 6x7 body with waist level finder; plain prism; 67 lenses: 90mm (or 135mm macro), 55mm, 45mm; 1 or 2 35mm bodies (i.e. LX and a couple of lenses plus an MX); without the 35mm bodies there is still room for a 67 200/4 or a similar lens. Sometimes a flash too (AF280T or Sunpak 383) can fit as well. Once I've been able to carry both the 6x7 and a 645 body (with a couple of 67 lenses, used on the 645 with the adapter) and a Sunpak 455 flash. It's amazing how many bodies, lenses and accessories it can host , unless you try to load very long lenses (a couple of summers ago I decided to have with me the K 300/4... there was still a lot of room - promptly filled with all the needed equipment - but the weight was a bit too much for my taste). Hope this helps. Ciao, Gianfranco ===== __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com
