Got it! Thanks, keith
Mark Roberts wrote:
>
> Keith Whaley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >Mark Roberts wrote:
> >>
> >> Mark D. wrote:
> >>
> >> > So, I'm considering getting one of the 35/2.8's. I
> >> > seem to recall the A35/2.8 being poorly regarded. So
> >> > I've been looking at the M35/2.8 but Boz's website
> >> > indicates that they share the same optical formula.
> >>
> >> There are two different versions of the M28/2.8 and only the later one
> >> shares the same optical formula with the A28/2.8
>
> >And how can we tell the difference, Mark?
> >Is this another case of where the IR mark is located?
>
> The earlier M28/2.8 has the chrome ring at the end of the barrel with the
> focusing grip. The later one (same optically as the "A" version) doesn't.
> See Boz's web page
> http://www.bdimitrov.de/kmp/lenses/primes/wide-angle/index.html
>
> The later version is supposedly quite rare.
>
> --
> Mark Roberts
> Photography and writing
> www.robertstech.com
