It's adequate for the purpose, I have one for times when I want a camera
which can use interchangeable lenses, but I don't want to risk an LX or MX.
I'm not in love with the camera, in my opinion it's viewfinder is barely
adequate a bit "squinty", with low magnification and low apparent brightness
and low apparent contrast although I've never had a hard time focusing as
some others have complained of. On a positive note the camera is light
and the combination shutter film advance sound is to my ear somewhat quieter
than the shutter/mirror sound from a K1000, K2, LX or MX.
At 04:56 PM 1/1/2003 -0500, you wrote:
Folks...
I've been considering getting a body to use with my beautiful 50mm f1.4
SMC-M.
I was looking at the MZ-M used.
What do you all have to say for this baby compared to the older MX/K1000/K2
etc. bodies?
any experiences for those who own an MZ-M?
Thanks,
Dave
Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend.
Inside of a dog, it's too dark to read. --Groucho Marx
