; 24mm adaptall; 180mm adaptall and 80-200mm 2.8 HELP?= Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: onet.poczta
Hi Fred, How do you assess K200/2.5?Better/worse than present FA200/2.8 lens? Is there a problem with bokeh like you say it is with K105/2.8 lens? If it is it is probably when the lens is wide open. I own K135/2.5 and it is also very nice lens. Do you think 43 Limited is better than A/FA 50/1.4 lenses? Alek Użytkownik Fred <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> napisał: >> The 180/2.5 is legendary and scarce. > >I saw a review once in Modern Photo that was (as I recall) quite >favorable. I've watched 2 or 3 of these go on eBay recently, which >was just for curiosity, since I have a K 200/2.5 that I'm very happy >with, but they did look interesting. > >> The 80-200/2.8 is a fine zoom. > >I think JCO just won one of these on eBay. He maybe doesn't have it >in his possession just yet, but perhaps he'll share his experiences >with it soon. (I'm personally curious as to just how it might >compare to the more common Tokina AT-X 80-200/2.8, which I can say >is a really nice fast zoom.) > >Fred > ***************r-e-k-l-a-m-a************** Chcesz oszczędzić na kosztach obsługi bankowej ? mBIZNES - konto dla firm http://epieniadze.onet.pl/mbiznes
