> Fred wrote: However, I still don't have a K VS1 200/3. Steve replied: > > You should try one, they`re nice. Fred wrote: I'm trying, Steve, I'm trying - I just haven't come up with one of 'em > yet, that's all - <g>. > If it's basically a "stretched out" version of the VS1 135/2.3, then > it ought to be darned good. ;-)
Well, I've finally found a lens about which to differ with the other two members of the Series One troika. I owned the 200/3 in M42. I was never as happy with the results as I was with my 135/2.3. The bokeh was great, but the lackluster colors reminded me of my Kiron 28/2. I continue to own the Pentax SMC 200/2.5K, which I feel beats the Vivitar hands-down (except in close focus) at all apertures at which I've tried them both. In fairness, I may not have tested the Vivitar under ideal conditions. I think I was still shooting indoor school plays with a monopod (not yet a tripod) and hadn't yet bought a release cable or a body with less vibration than the Super Program. If you want a lens that combines the Vivitar's 1.2-meter close focus, the Pentax's speed, and sharpness that's at least as good as either, you want the Tamron SP 180/2.5--about $400 to $550. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
