Hi Stan,
You Got me!!! of course the 85.
Bob
----- Original Message -----
From: "Stan Halpin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 3:20 PM
Subject: Re: Pentax K-primes
> Ah yes, the legendary 80 1.8! Uh, maybe that was 85 1.8?
>
> Sorry - couldn't resist.
>
> Stan
>
> on 1/21/03 2:41 PM, Bob Rapp at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > The 135 f2.5 is also a legend as are the 105 f2.8 and 80 f1.8 and you
can
> > throw in the 30 f2.8 as well.
> >
> > Bob Rapp
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "E. van Ginkel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 5:59 AM
> > Subject: RE: Pentax K-primes
> >
> >
> >> To all,
> >>
> >> Thanks for the replies.
> >> I wasn't aware that the K28/3.5 was such a cult lens. I only found
> >> information about it's M-brother. I bought the M28/2.8 (not the 3.5)
when
> > it
> >> was new. I find the M a dull performer, nothing special. Now searching
for
> >> the 35. Although Pentax-prices are lower over here then in the US, they
> > are
> >> also quit rare.
> >>
> >> How is the K135/3.5 compared with the SMCK135/2.5 I also have. I find
that
> >> one a nice performer, mayby a bit on the large side, but as good a
> > performer
> >> as my Leica Elmarit 2.8/135 (and that one is really heavy)I have for my
> >> Leica M6.
> >>
> >> Rene
> >>
> >> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> >> Van: Bob Rapp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >> Verzonden: dinsdag 21 januari 2003 11:12
> >> Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> Onderwerp: Re: Pentax K-primes
> >>
> >>
> >> Hi Rene,
> >> The 135, as good as it is, can be easily bettered. Probably not
> >> noticeably so when using standard colour negative film. The 28 is a
> >> different story. This lens is one of Pentax's great lenses that has
been
> >> equalled but not really noticeably surpassed. It has a fat field and
> > almost
> >> no distortion - that is not an easy feat! Try and find 35 SMC Pentax
f3.5
> >> (not M) to go with it.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >>
> >> Bob Rapp
> >> ----- Original Message -----
> >> From: "E. van Ginkel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 4:22 PM
> >> Subject: RE: Pentax K-primes
> >>
> >>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> I understand I have got them cheap. Pentax secondhand-prices are lower
> > in
> >>> Europe then in the US. But what I want to know is how good are they
> >> compared
> >>> with the newer ones
> >>>
> >>> Rene
> >>>
> >>> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> >>> Van: Ken Archer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >>> Verzonden: maandag 20 januari 2003 16:25
> >>> Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>> Onderwerp: Re: Pentax K-primes
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> If you are having any doubts, I will happily take them off your hands
> >>> for the same amount of money plus shipping. ;-)
> >>>
> >>> On Monday 20 January 2003 09:07 pm, E. van Ginkel wrote:
> >>>> I just bought two smc pentax K-primes (not M) a 3.5/135mm (35euro/U$)
> >>>> and a 3.5/28mm (41euro/U$). Are these lenses any good? Is the price
> >>>> right?
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Ken Archer Canine Photography
> >>> San Antonio, Texas
> >>> "Business Is Going To The Dogs"
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
