> I envisage adding this lens to my "lightweight snapshooting" kit, > which is currently made of the LX and 35mm f/3.5.
> Yes, as far as I'm concerned, but I tend to use it as a complement > to a 28mm, a 30mm or even a 40mm (in this case, in a hiking kit > where you also find a 85/2 and a few accessories). > It would be great paired with the 35mm you mentioned. I think that a 20mm lens (although I can't help in judging the M 20/4's specific qualities here, since I've used only the A 20/2.8) should make a fine complement to anything from 28mm to 50mm (well, at least to 35mm or 40mm). And you would probably like the compactness for your purposes, too, David. In comparison, the A 20/2.8 is not nearly so compact - the barrel itself is about the size of a normal lens, but it has a wide filter thread (67mm) flange stuck on the front of it, which is quite nice for allowing filter use without vignetting, but which makes the lens somewhat "fat" to carry around. The 20/4 is quite "trim" in comparison. Fred
