All email programs seem to have their own way of recognising threads, but none I have encountered so far have a 100% hit rate. Best, Jostein
======= At 2003-02-04, 00:40:00 you wrote: ======= >On Mon, 3 Feb 2003, Mike Johnston wrote: >> Finally, I'm pleased to report that my weekly column, "The Sunday Morning >> Photographer," has just been picked up by photo.net > >First, congratulations! I am glad that a wider audience can now enjoy >your column. > >Here's an unrelated topic. To handle the large volume of this list, I use >"Sort by Threads" to select the topics I am interested in. Not sure if >this happens to other people, but my email program is not able to sort >Mike's emails. So all Mike's responses would appear as a new thread, >instead of following the post he was replying to. > >Sorry, Mike, I did not mean to pick on you :-) A few other posters' >emails behave the same way. Just that your emails are on my "always read" >list, that's why I find it so noticeable. > >I found that the "Reference:" field header (which has the message ID of >the email you are replying to in order to sort the emails into threads) >was missing in your emails. I am not familiar with Entourage, so I do not >know if there is a setting you can change. Anyone else who have noticed >this problem? Or could it be a problem with my email program instead? > >-- >--Lawrence Kwan--SMS Info Service/Ringtone Convertor--PGP:finger/www-- >[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.vex.net/~lawrence/ -Key ID:0x6D23F3C4-- = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Best regards. Jostein http://oksne.net 2003-02-04
