Bruce Dayton wrote: > Matt, > > While making a 16X20 may be a snap for 35mm film, I would submit that > it is painfully obvious when compared to MF or LF. I personally don't > think 35mm generally looks that good beyond 11X14 - even there the > difference is obvious. > > Bruce
Looks great when the 35mm image was shot with Kodachrome 25. Is there any really slow fine grained film around anymore??? anything, that is, of the superiour quality of K24? annsan
