Lawrence wrote: "Yet, Pal is raving it as a > true professional > system. > > I personally thinks Pentax *ist D looks way better > than the Olympus, and > more like a real SLR rather than Olympus' ZLR look."
Yup. The Olydak is an E20 without a glued-on lens. Talk about unoriginal. Boring. At this point it's nor a professional system. A flash and a hand full of lenses if all you can get. Plus you have to buy them new. At least with C, N, and Pentax you can get a ton of great used pro glass for relatively cheap. If Pentax came out with the Olydak, I would imagine people on this list would say: "what the heck is this thing?" More K mount users would jump ship than ever before. Except Pal of course... --- Kwan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 4 Mar 2003, Rob Studdert wrote: > > > Far from bland? But it looks exactly like its > ZLR models E10 and E20. > > > it is not sexy, and it hardly looks > professional. > > Looks can deceive those uneducated > > In case you did not realize, those comments are > directed to Pal. I was > just puzzled how he can write off *ist D based on > its looks. Pal stated > that *ist D styling was unoriginal, unimaginative, > non-sexy and > derivative; and therefore it has no chance to > succeed. > > My point is that Olympus 4/3 SLR is just as > unoriginal, unimaginative, > non-sexy and derivative. Yet, Pal is raving it as a > true professional > system. > > I personally thinks Pentax *ist D looks way better > than the Olympus, and > more like a real SLR rather than Olympus' ZLR look. > > > -- > --Lawrence Kwan--SMS Info Service/Ringtone > Convertor--PGP:finger/www-- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.vex.net/~lawrence/ > -Key ID:0x6D23F3C4-- > __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Tax Center - forms, calculators, tips, more http://taxes.yahoo.com/
