On 4 Mar 2003 at 19:25, Paul Franklin Stregevsky wrote: > But I see > your point: If the rear glass can be much smaller, why is the front "full size"?
There is no point it's just the physics of the beast. Take a look at a 400/4 for the 67 it's almost cylindrical from the 400/4 (100mm diameter) front glass to the external bayonet mount. So it's like saying why isn't the 67 400/4 larger at the front. Rob Studdert HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications.html Pentax user since 1986 PDMLer since 1998
