> -----Original Message----- > From: Cotty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >Interesting. I read a review of the new Canon 24-70 > somewhere, and one > >of the points they made was that the thing was so good > that it showed > >explicitly small differences in various lenses. > > > >In other words, it was *more* important to have good lenses. > > Hmm. But wasn't there an argument recently that the > resolving power of > good quality modern lenses far and away miles ahead of the > resolving > power of (say) 6MP sensors? So, a reasonable lens on the > front of yer 6MP > digi would still be capable of giving more info than the > sensor would > accept? > > If this is the case, there must be a break-even point, and then a > surpassing towards an area where only the best lenses would > be able to > keep up with the best digi camera technology?
Could be. Here's the article: http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/lenses/24-70-review.shtml Scroll down to "Preliminary Conclusion". tv
