marked value.
At 11:39 AM 3/5/2003 -0600, you wrote:
But on an actual lens the difference is 1.0 stops, right? I'm working on the assumption that the numbers printed on the lens are approximations, but that the lens itself goes by the actual values.
chris
On Wed, 5 Mar 2003, Peter Alling wrote:
> f1 is about .97 stops faster that f1.4.
>
> At 11:29 AM 3/5/2003 -0500, you wrote:
> >On Tue, 4 Mar 2003, J. C. O'Connell wrote:
> > > A F1.2 lens is LESS than a half-stop faster than a F1.4
> >
> >Eh?
> >
> >I thought it was was a halfstop? What's a halfstop quicker than 1.4? Is an
> >f1 lens not one full stop quicker?
> >
> >--
> >http://www.infotainment.org <-> more fun than a poke in your eye.
> >http://www.eighteenpercent.com <-> photography and portfolio.
>
> Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend.
> Inside of a dog, it's too dark to read. --Groucho Marx
>
>
Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend. Inside of a dog, it's too dark to read. --Groucho Marx
