It would be better to use the FM2n, since that was in production for a long time with a price history. I would not be surprised if the price ratio difference between the K1000 and FM/FM2n was pretty constant over time. When the FM2n stopped being sold last year it sold for $400-$500. The K1000 price was probably in the 2:3 ratio range (?) That would be a reasonable guess as to what a K1000 would cost today.

BR

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Here's an interesting question.  Suppose that Pentax made a brand new
K1000, metal body and all>  What would they have to charge for such a
beast?  Could it be made much cheaper than the Nikon FMA3?







Reply via email to