In one point Bojidar is right.namely it is much easier and cheaper to find seconf hand
Canon gear-great advantage!
Alek
Użytkownik Roland Mabo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> napisał:
>>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 19:56:23 +0100
>>
>>Nice to see such words! I agree with you in most points. I really >doubt
>>that for everyday shooting one get better photos with Canon.
>
>I doubt that too, but many *believes* differently.
>
>>Some my friend chose Canon and zooms usually and even primes but when >they
>>look at my slides they even prefer my Pentax glass.
>
>Canon makes some great glass too, but I believe it\'s a personal thing here.
>They all have their characteristics. Isn\'t Canon and Nikon quite close here?
>High contrast, cool colour temperature? I\'ve got that impression. I believe
>Pentax and Minolta are closer when it comes to optical character.
>
>>And I believe Pentax soon or later will come with IS and USM and there
>> >will be no difference between P and C.
>
>I believe this too.
>However, I can understand those who doesn\'t want to wait.
>Pentax has, in the past, showed a bad record when it comes to new
>technology. The Z-serie was great, but it took time to update it. MZ-serie
>was great, in the beginning, but the MZ-5n and -3 are essentially the same
>as the MZ-5 released in 1996. I can understand those who wants a faster
>development. I believe this will happen with digital, perhaps it will be too
>fast. :-) Anyway, two more *ist\'s are on it\'s way. I\'m sure that they will
>be great and having new technology, not only technology that equals the
>competition but actually beats them.
>
>Best wishes,
>Roland
>
>
>_________________________________________________________________
>Lättare att hitta drömresan med MSN Resor http://www.msn.se/resor/
>
