> Might be that the minimum focus distance of your eye is better than that of
> your M42 50mm. Sounds like a cool project, though.
Urf. In a way that the extension tube wouldn't help with? (With no
extension I couldn't get a recognizeable image, nor with a longer
extension, but with 12mm extension behind a 50/1.4, it was clearly
an image of the scene it was pointed at, and that "point of least
blurriness" came with the lens focused to about 1m. But like I said,
it never got sharp.)
Is there another aspect of minumum focussing distance that I'm not
grokking? (I could try adding a tube in _front_ of the lens, moving
the peephole-thingie further away...)
-- Glenn
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
