Re: OT: Bayer image example

[Caveman]

Wouldn't this be the correct way to print/display the digital image 
before starting to do comparisons with film ? If you process it with 
interpolation and god knows what other algorithms, then how can you jump 
out the gun with conclusions like "digital is smoother and has less 
grain" etc. If I take two images and get them through that great 
FixItLaterInPhotoshop (TM) technology, doing different processing to 
them, how can I assess the quality of the original images by looking at 
the processed ones ? Isn't this like comparing a camera clara painting 
with a photograph ?

Rob Studdert wrote:
For anyone so inclined I have posted a really rough page showing a section of 
the raw bayer map image captured by my Oly E-10 digicam and the subsequent 
"demosaiced" image.

I can help but be amazed that the output is a good as it is, lets hope Foveon 
is successful. I'll leave it up for a day then it's gone, beware the page is 
about 600kB in total.

http://members.ozemail.com.au/~geroc/bayer.html

Cheers,

Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT)  +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/
Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998