Metal vs. Plastic is a tough trade off. A lighter body will hit the ground or swing with less momentum, reducing the force available to do damage. Metal will dent, whereas plastic will give but then crack. Polycarbonate is tough stuff, even if it doesn't fell as solid. I'd actually like to see some "tests to destruction" for camera bodies. Anyone know of some? (Official ones, not the kind that Tom does ;-)
Digital cameras are evolving quickly so there is a reason to buy a new one every few years. Film cameras are more stable, and I really do think e are going to see very few really new nigh end film SLR's. There's just not money in them anymore, and the "pro show" cameras are now digital, so its' the 1Ds and not the F5 that has the most "drool" value. Like it or not, I think the *ist and it's ilk are the new "sweet spot" of film SLR's. If Pentax does come out with another film SLR, I think the best we can get is a Mg alloy *ist with (maybe) and aperture simulator. Steven Desjardins Department of Chemistry Washington and Lee University Lexington, VA 24450 (540) 458-8873 FAX: (540) 458-8878 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
