Skip to site navigation (Press enter)
Re: Lenses without aperture rings (WAS: Re[2]: Lens compatibilityin perspective)
Caveman
Sun, 06 Jul 2003 17:48:56 -0700
Alan Chan wrote:
Otherwise, this is just pure talking.
Pom Pom talking.
cheers, caveman
Previous message
View by thread
View by date
Next message
Re: Lenses without aperture rings (WAS: Re[2]: Lens compati...
Caveman
Re: Lenses without aperture rings (WAS: Re[2]: Lens co...
Caveman
Re: Lenses without aperture rings (WAS: Re[2]: Len...
William Robb
Re: Lenses without aperture rings (WAS: Re[2]: Len...
Lon Williamson
Reply via email to
Search the site
The Mail Archive home
pdml - all messages
pdml - about the list
Expand
Previous message
Next message