Are you sure its a generational thing. I don't recall getting very many
prints from slides which account for 95 percent (best guess) of my
personal (as opposed to work related) photo work since 1958. Never
had much use for prints once I "discovered" slides. I now keep print
film in one body for to get prints for others now and then, but for a
long time now there is always someone else. For me, viewing on the
monitor is just
Otis Wright
Herb Chong wrote:
no it doesn't. it means that prints are irrelevant to the new generation.
Herb...
----- Original Message -----
From: "T Rittenhouse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 01:10
Subject: Re: Digital question
These statistics tend to prove what I always figured. Digital cameras are
status symbols, not photographic tools.
