The 3200 is high enough resolution to make prints of about 10x12 from 35mm negatives. And it does that very well. I would go for the 3200. I have one, and I'm very pleased with it. Paul
Pat White wrote: > > I'm planning to buy a flatbed scanner in the near future, for scanning > prints and 6x7 negatives. The two I'm looking at are the Epson 2400 and > 3200. Users of the 2400 seem very happy with it, and it's half the price of > the 3200, here in Canada. > > The 3200 has higher resolution. The question is whether it's high enough to > make it a useful scanner for 35mm negatives. If it is, that could be a good > reason to spend the extra money. Has anyone tried scanning 35mm negs with > either of these scanners? > > Pat White
