"tom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >I think we'll se a 1D replacement, maybe called a 3D? 1.3 multiplier, >6 to 9 megs. That camera has to be fast, so the sensor won't be huge. >This is the only segment they're feeling any pressure in, as the D2H >comes to market.
Yep. That's the first Canon DSLR I'd expect to see replaced, too. It already has a (physically) larger sensor so all they really *need* to do to beat the Nikon D2H is increase the buffer size and add wireless data transfer. Not even sure that would justify a new model number. Upping the pixel count to 6 meg would justify an new model designation but I don't know if they would bother increasing the pixel count for its intended PJ customers. I guess news photogs would always have the option of shooting at lower resolution if they wanted to. -- Mark Roberts Photography and writing www.robertstech.com
