I have the 15/3.5 fisheye. Truly great lens. So, maybe I should go for the 15/3.5 wide angle. Even at 444 euro?
:-) Paul Delcour > From: "Rob Studdert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Organization: AudioBias Systems Engineering > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 09:05:24 +1000 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Fisheye - 135/2.5 - 15/3.5 > Resent-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Resent-Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2003 19:28:38 -0400 > > On 9 Oct 2003 at 22:45, Paul Delcour wrote: > >> One of the 15/3.5 lenses I missed on ebay because I was overbid, is now on >> sale again as the buyer also bought the A version. He's asking more than he >> ended up paying for it (small wonder), but I wander, now with my fisheye (and >> my >> Tokina 17/3.5) whether it's worth going for it once more. No doubt great >> lens, >> but at 444 euro's or 555 buy now it's too much I feel. > > I think you'll find the P15/3.5 very different from the Tokina 17/3.5, the T > won't last long. Which fisheye do you own? The 15/3.5 and the 16/2.8 make a > great pair. > > Rob Studdert > HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA > Tel +61-2-9554-4110 > UTC(GMT) +10 Hours > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/ > Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998 >
