Hello Rüdiger, You wrote:
> Have you also compared the AF of the MZ-S with the *istD. About fast-moving subjects, maybe the MZ-S can get one extra shot during the same time (say 6 frames while the *ist D takes 5). > Somebody on a > German userforum reported, that the low light abillity is better on the > MZ-S. Yes, I also confirm that. On a given subject, the MZ-S still works about one EV lower than the *ist D. > How is the AF-speed of the S2. Have you also done such a car-test. No. I only tried the same car with the same driver, same speed, etc. with the MZ-S, and I got one extra shot. > Looking on the test results on pdreview, it is obvious, that the S2pro is > better than the 10D, D100 or SD9. > Do you know, how the *istD compares to the 10D and D100? No. Dario
