i have never thought so. it is good, but not great. my recent experiments with various of my lenses on the *istD make it clear me me that lens quality is even more important with the camera than with a film camera. it's clearly better than the $70 lenses, but quite a bit less quality than the top FA* lenses.
Herb.... ----- Original Message ----- From: "Raimo Korhonen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, November 14, 2003 2:20 PM Subject: Vs: FA28-105/3.2-4.5 > I hope you are right - but the 24-90 mm is very good indeed. > All the best!
