-----Original Message----- > From: Mark Roberts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > >> At least high-speed. In latest issue of , then at > >> iso1600 Superia was much better, having > >> significantly smaller grain than noise in both cameras. > >> As we can see, no technology is perfect and so film has > still some serious > >> advantages over digital :-) > > > >I use the 1600 at some indoor horse venues.It actuall > makes a half decent 8x10. I dont > >think i'd go bigger though. > > Wait until next year's digital cameras. Or perhaps the year > after. Not > much longer, though. > The writing is on the wall.
Apply a little noise reduction to the ISO 1600 image and it won't look much different from the ISO 400 image. I can distinctly remember making a few prints from 1600 speed files and thinking, "Well, at least it's better than Fuji 1600!" tv
