I'm currently using a 7 year old Epson Stylus Photo to print 4"X6" mainly, with the occasional 8"X10". For the more serious images, I'm using a 2000P by Epson getting "Archival Quality" prints up to 13"X19". Just did a gallery show with 35 images done on the 2000P and the viewers were blow away by what could be done on a home printer.
Kenneth Waller ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bruce Dayton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: OT:Inkjet printer recommendations > Geoff, > > Most ink jet printers are cheap. It is the ink and paper > (consumables) that are expensive. Epson, Canon and HP could almost > give away the printers and still make money on the consumables. In > fact, that is just about what they are doing. The features you get > for paying alot more are duty cycle (work the printer harder), better > paper handling and possibly wider print carriage. At this point the > big three (Epson, Canon, HP) are all producing very good photo > printers that you would be hard pressed to be able to really tell a > difference between. Most of the printers work best when you use the > manufacturers inks and papers. I have used all three and can't really > say anything bad about any of them. > > -- > Best regards, > Bruce > > > > Wednesday, December 10, 2003, 11:47:10 AM, you wrote: > > mec> I was wandering what people are using for printing photographs. At our last get- > mec> together Christian has some nice prints, which he claimed were printed with a > mec> cheap printer, I am not sure what he was implying about the quality, but the > mec> images looked good. It got me thinking I should get one of decent quality to print > mec> scanned slides and for a future digital camera. > > mec> Thanks, > > mec> Geoff > > > >
