Hello William
What do you think of the K105/2.8. I've had it for many years, but I hardly
ever use it. Should I?
BTW: I hardly ever use the 2.0/85mm either.
Jens
-----Oprindelig meddelelse-----
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]På; vegne af William Robb
Sendt: 22. marts 2001 04:40
Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Emne: Re: What's the good or bad word on the M-85 F2.0??
----- Original Message -----
From: "John Mustarde" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: March 21, 2001 9:25 PM
Subject: Re: What's the good or bad word on the M-85 F2.0??
> I'm gonna go out and shoot some sharp pics with my M 85/2 just
to
> prove everyone wrong.
>
> I hope.
>
> I'll check to see how it compares to the FA 100/2.8 Macro, A*
200/4
> Macro, FA* 600/4, F* 300/4.5, K 200/2.5....
>
> ... and the lowly but optically fine A 50/2.
Well, I will see how it does compared to the 77, the A100mm f2.8
macro, and perhaps the K105mm f2.8.
William Robb
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
