On 5/1/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged: >> > On a slightly different note, I showed the following pic to a colleague: >> > >> > <http://www.macads.co.uk/snaps/portraits/images/pic3.html> >> > >> > And he said, "yeah, that's a really nice shot, lovely. It's a great shame >> > that his eye is in such deep shadow, but never mind..." >> > >> > This guy is a cameraman as well. >> > >> > "......." (me literally speechless) >> >> <genuine question> >> Why? Is it impossible to brighten the other side with a slave flash? >> </genuine question> >> >> Kostas > >I think the point is, if Cotty had wanted to do >that he would have. > >annsan
Sorry Kostas, I didn't see your post for some reason. Ann is correct. I was moving the (tungsten light around) and immediately liked the hard shadow it created, and when one if his eyes disappeared, I knew it was right. I moved it a little more to get it just where I wanted it. The I made sure that the contrast was increased slightly so there was no way it peep through the gloom ;-) If I show a pic on the web or in print, you can be sure that it is exactly as I want it to be seen. I get ti see all the dross, so no point in subjecting anyone else to it! Best, Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche ||=====| www.macads.co.uk/snaps _____________________________ Free UK Mac Ads www.macads.co.uk