This wasn't comment but a real question.  I myslef would never pay $3000+ for a 
cmaera.  The *ist D is about the upper limit for me.  I do think that pros and 
"enthusiasts" that use Pentax MF might spring for it since they spend bigger money on 
their equipment.


Steven Desjardins
Department of Chemistry
Washington and Lee University
Lexington, VA 24450
(540) 458-8873
FAX: (540) 458-8878
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 01/27/04 05:54PM >>>
Nah, just like, "not more than ten people on this list would ever pay more than 
$1500 for an *istD".

--

Steve Desjardins wrote:
> Suppose Pentax came out with a similar camera for $3200 (I'm assuming the price of 
> the Nikon d2h)  Do you think they would sell many?  
> 
> 
>>>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] 01/27/04 03:37PM >>>
> 
> After all at the rate we're going that technology will be there for the taking
> in K mount in about a decade...
> 
> At 03:19 PM 1/27/04, you wrote:
> 
>>Christian,
>>
>>That is what I read on at nikondigital.org.  The buffer is 40 jpeg/20 RAW.
>>Pretty amazing huh?  The Nikonites are already crying about what this means
>>to Nikon.
>>
>>We (Pentaxians) are pretty much imune to it. :-)
>>
>>César
>>Panama City, Florida
>>
>>-- -----Original Message-----
>>-- From: Christian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
>>-- Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2004 3:06 PM
>>--
>>-- did I read that right?  8.2MP and 8.5 frames per second for
>>-- 40 frames?
>>--
>>-- Christian
>>--
>>-- ----- Original Message -----
>>-- From: "Cotty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>-- Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2004 2:37 PM
>>--
>>-- > <http://www.digitalkamera.de/Kameras/CanonEOS-1DII.asp>
>>-- >
>>-- >
>>-- >
>>-- >
>>-- > Cheers,
>>-- >   Cotty
>>-- >
>>-- >
>>-- > ___/\__
>>-- > ||   (O)   |      People, Places, Pastiche
>>-- > ||=====|      www.macads.co.uk/snaps 
>>-- > _____________________________
>>-- > Free UK Mac Ads www.macads.co.uk 
>>-- >
>>--
> 
> 
> I drink to make other people interesting.
>          -- George Jean Nathan  
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

-- 
graywolf
http://graywolfphoto.com 

"You might as well accept people as they are,
you are not going to be able to change them anyway."




Reply via email to