At 12:31 28.3.2001 +0200, Pål wrote:
>Olivier wrote:
>
>> Pentax-A 24mm f/2.8 Performances : 3
>> Pentax-A 35mm f/2.8 Performances : 3
>> Pentax-A* 85mm f/1.4 Performances : 3
>> Pentax-A* 135mm f/1.8 Performances : 3
>> Pentax-A* 300mm f/2.8 ED-IF Performances : 3
>
>
>I belive this sort of drivel shouldn't even be posted here. Some may actually believe
>in it. Its pure nonsense. Anyone who gives the A* 85, 135, and 300 above a mediocre
>score of "3" is positively out of their minds. Likewise, compare them to a true
>medoicre lens as the A 35/2.8.
>The A* 85/1.4, A* 135/1.8 and the A* 300/2.8 are all "5" lenses among the best in
>their class ever.
>
>
>>Pentax-FA 85mm f/1.4 IF Performances : 5 Rapport qualite/prix : 5 Cote : 5
>Année : 1993
>
>
>This is also pure and utter hoghwash. The FA* 85/1.4 isn't nearly as good as the A*
>135/1.8 or the A* 300/2.8.
I fully agree with Pål!
Antti-Pekka
---
* Antti-Pekka Virjonen * Fiskarsinkatu 7 D * GSM: +358 400 789753 *
* Computec Oy Turku * FIN-20750 Turku Finland * Fax: +358 2 413 7777 *
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
