"Rothman, Aric" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >I have considered one of these, but at it's maximum medium >format resolution, it would produce only a 8.3 MP file >for a 6x7 original, which is about two megapixels less than >it can do with 35mm. > >Is there a noticeable difference between medium format and >35mm scans with this unit? I realize there are other issues >besides pixel count.
Indeed there are. 645 scans at 1125 dpi are *almost* as good as 35mm scans at 3600 dpi (on my other scanner - the Minolta goes to 2820 for 35mm). I'd guess 67 scans at 1125 would be every bit as good as 35mm scans. Perhaps better, given the lack of grain. -- Mark Roberts Photography and writing www.robertstech.com
