Alan
David Miers wrote:
Don't feel bad, there's more then one traitor here!
-----Original Message----- From: Alan Kerr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 13, 2004 2:49 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: And then then came minolta
sorry thought that was going to my Minolta group :(
Alan Kerr wrote:
http://join.msn.com/?page=dept/bcomm&pgmarket=en-ca&RU=http%3a%2f%2fjoin.msnThey can call it whatever they like as long as it fits my Maxxum lenses (don't know what all you that have Dynax lenses will do <g>)
Alan
Peter Alling wrote:
Yes it does. Yes it will. Does anyone find it ironic that Konica left the SLR market years ago and bought Minolta, who always had a better reputation and larger customer base to get back in.
At 09:03 PM 2/12/04, you wrote:
Anything is possible, but the question is, "Will Pentax do it in the near future?" The same question has been asked countless times over the years and the answer is always "no". Btw, does anyone think the name "konica minolta" looks stupid? Are they really going to make it the final product? :-o
Regards, Alan Chan http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
With in body anti-shake (to get back on topic, this will show Pentax that it is possible - and that perhaps they do not need to look at IS lenses anymore)...
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0402/04021220maxxum7digital.asp
_________________________________________________________________ The new MSN 8: advanced junk mail protection and 2 months FREE*
.com%2f%3fpage%3dmisc%2fspecialoffers%26pgmarket%3den-ca
I drink to make other people interesting.
-- George Jean Nathan