On Feb 15, 2004, at 9:37 PM, Fred wrote:
Most of these shots seem to have been executed against questionable backgrounds.
What's "questionable" about 'em?
Fred
They're inherently busy. It's tough to get nice bokeh when there's a
lot going on in the backgroud.
On Feb 15, 2004, at 9:37 PM, Fred wrote:
On Feb 15, 2004, at 9:37 PM, Fred wrote:
- Re: SMC Pentax-A* 135mm 1:1.8 vs. Voigtländer 1... Rob Studdert
- RE: SMC Pentax-A* 135mm 1:1.8 vs. Voigtla... J. C. O'Connell
- Re: SMC Pentax-A* 135mm 1:1.8 vs. Voigtländ... Tanya Mayer Photography
- Re: SMC Pentax-A* 135mm 1:1.8 vs. Voigtl„nder... Rob Studdert
- Re: SMC Pentax-A* 135mm 1:1.8 vs. Voigtländer 125mm ... John Mustarde
- Re: SMC Pentax-A* 135mm 1:1.8 vs. Voigtlän der... Rob Studdert
- RE: SMC Pentax-A* 135mm 1:1.8 vs. Voigtl... J. C. O'Connell
- FS: 105/2.8 (Was Re: SMC Pentax-A* 13... Paul Stenquist
- Re: FS: 105/2.8 (Was Re: SMC Pent... Shel Belinkoff
- Re: FS: 105/2.8 Fred
- Re: SMC Pentax-A* 135mm ... Paul Stenquist
- Re: SMC Pentax-A* 135mm 1:1.8 vs. Voigtländer 125mm ... Scott Nelson
- Re: SMC Pentax-A* 135mm 1:1.8 vs. Voigtländer ... Peter Alling
