This is the text that goes with the image:
------------------
About 10:00PM. There had been a rain. This is my favorite part of Toronto,
and this is how I remember it. I thought of correcting the color, but then I
remember the warmth of this city. I once lived a few steps from where the
photo was taken.
Kodak PJC 1600, Pentax ME Super, 85mm f/1.8 at f/2.8. Hand held, Shutter
unknown. Scanned on HP ScanJet 6200C flatbed.
------------------
This and other comments may be viewed by clicking the appropriate link under
the image.
PJC1600 was excellent for an ISO 1600 film. It scanned better than any other
1600 I've ever tried. Unfortunately, Kodak has discontinued it. This and
other bold decisions (like discontinuing Royal Gold 25) have helped Kodak
stock to under perform the S&P 500 for many years now.
The SMC K 85/1.8 is a great lens.
Regards,
Bob...
Give blood. Play hockey.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Steve Larson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, March 31, 2001 7:59 AM
Subject: Re: OT:RE: Chernobyl effect on film (fwd)
> Bob,
>
> [snip]
> My personal experience is that a roll of
> > PJC1600, not in camera, withstood 4 passes through these X-ray machines
> (plus on year in
> > the back of a Toyota Supra in the California sun) and still produced the
> photo below.
> >
> > http://www.photocritique.net/g/s?zzyHLn-p29100445
>
> Very nice night shot! Is that the Yorkville near Santa Rosa? What lens, f
> stop and
> shutter speed, only if you remember. PJC1600 looks like a nice film, not
> very much
> grain at all.
>
> > Regards,
> > Bob...
>
>
> Steve Larson
> Redondo Beach, California
>
> -
> This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
> go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
> visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
>
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
