> From: edwin > > I think the answer is that the DA lenses are smaller than they would be if > they were not DA. Does anybody make a 16-45 that covers 35mm format? > Sigma's 15-35 is not exactly small.
by the same reasoning lenses in 35mm format and, say, 6x6, covering the same angle, should be about the same size. well, apparently (luckily!) my SMCA 24mm/2.8 is *much* smaller than hassy's 50mm/2.8 <g> best, mishka
