Also Rob, I don't mean to monopolize your time... Which tools in photoshop would you recommend using? I find the smudge tool (if that's what it's called) works fairly well when viewing the image at high magnification and then reverting the display to original size. Any other suggestions? Thanks again. Tom C. ----- Original Message ----- From: "aimcompute" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2001 5:03 PM Subject: Re: bad processing > Rob Studdert wrote: > > > Hi Dan, > > > > Digital ICE is no panacea for scratched film, the best results by far are > still > > had by scanning scratch free film. I would venture to suggest that even > > though there is a time penalty involved that repairing scratches via > > Photoshop will yield far better results than relying on Digital ICE. > > > > > Hi Rob, > > I am interested in the new Nikon Scanners when they are released. I would > guess that your comment above is based on the fact that no software can > match a human operator's intuition on where to apply changes to the > digitized image. Is this correct, or does Digital ICE produce some kind of > uniform degradation when used? Thanks. > > P.S. Digital ICE is not really a deciding factor for me, but it sounds > good. > > Tom C. > - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
