In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mark Erickson) wrote:

> Since digital cameras are high-volume items, it's probably significantly 
> more profitable to keep this development in-house rather than pay 
> royalties to, say, Microsoft (or even PalmSource). 

Mobile phones are much higher-volume items, and a large proportion of them 
run third-party operating systems: Symbian, Palm or Microsoft. Cameras 
have much simpler communications needs than mobiles, and the user 
interface requirements are quite fierce.

--- 
John Dallman, [EMAIL PROTECTED], HTML mail is treated as probable spam.

Reply via email to