We've had a lot of speculation, but here's what I would actually do. I have no idea how typical I am.
I realize that I'm not as bothered by the APS sensor because I'm not an ultrawide angle fan. I've used the 20-35 on my MZ-S but don't use it that often on 20. OTOH, I have a Tokina 80-200 f2.8 which is now an excellent sports lens. Yes, I know I this is not a real magnification effect etc., but my point is that I am happy with the FOV my old lenses now have. I would also be perfectly happy to buy a FF sensor camera, but it would have to get much cheaper to tempt me. If the *istD where $600 and the FF version were $1350, would I spend the extra? Probably not. The original $1350 for the current APS *ist D got me digital capabilities in the first place, which was a major change over my then current cameras. I'm not sure how much I would pay for a bigger sensor when the APS version seems to suit my needs just fine. I'd probably invest the money in a lens. Steven Desjardins Department of Chemistry Washington and Lee University Lexington, VA 24450 (540) 458-8873 FAX: (540) 458-8878 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
