Next post, it goes.
Promise.
cheers, frank
ps: speaking of wastes of bandwidth, how about this thread? This isn't 1982, guys. "Wasting bandwidth". Geez, gimme a break! -f
"The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist fears it is true." -J. Robert Oppenheimer
From: John Forbes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Signature lines Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 23:33:30 -0000
Hear, hear! The only ones that work are simple factual statements about, or descriptions, of the poster. Cotty's is an example. All the rest are a pain. Even the cleverest ones quickly lose their impact, and become irritating. Most are simply pretentious, and a few are beneath contempt.
John
On Tue, 23 Mar 2004 15:29:20 -0500, Daniel J. Matyola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
IMHO, all signature lines, whether politically inflamatory or just "cutsie,"
are to be avoided on a list such as this as an unnecessary waste of
bandwidth.
-- Using M2, Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/
_________________________________________________________________
STOP MORE SPAM with the MSN Premium and get 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?pgmarket=en-ca&page=byoa/prem&xAPID=1994&DI=1034&SU=http://hotmail.com/enca&HL=Market_MSNIS_Taglines
